The 2016-2021 Outlook for Artists' Chalk and Crayons, Modeling Clay and Other Modeling Material, Tempera Colors, Fingerpaint, Block Printing Ink, and Watercolors Excluding Drawing and India Ink in the United States

Jan, 2013   |   780  Pages   |   ISBN : 000625469G   |   Icon Group International, Inc   |   Format : PDF

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for artists' chalk and crayons, modeling clay and other modeling material, tempera colors, fingerpaint, block printing ink, and watercolors excluding drawing and India ink across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for artists' chalk and crayons, modeling clay and other modeling material, tempera colors, fingerpaint, block printing ink, and watercolors excluding drawing and India ink. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for artists' chalk and crayons, modeling clay and other

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 16
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 18
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 20
3.1 Executive Summary 20
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 22
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 24
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 29
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 50
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 71
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 73
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 75
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 78
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 80
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 81
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 83
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 85
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 89
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 93
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 95
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 103
4 GREAT LAKES 111
4.1 Executive Summary 111
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 113
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 115
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 129
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 144
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 146
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 153
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 160
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 162
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 171
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 180
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 182
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 195
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 209
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 211
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 221
5 MID-ATLANTIC 231
5.1 Executive Summary 231
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 233
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 235
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 236
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 237
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 238
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 238
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 239
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 241
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 247
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 254
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 256
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 266
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 276
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 278
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 303
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 330
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 332
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 349
6 NEW ENGLAND 366
6.1 Executive Summary 366
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 368
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 370
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 375
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 380
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 382
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 387
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 393
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 395
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 404
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 413
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 415
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 419
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 423
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 425
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 426
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 428
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 430
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 433
7 PLAINS 436
7.1 Executive Summary 436
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 438
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 440
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 445
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 450
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 452
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 455
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 460
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 462
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 469
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 476
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 478
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 484
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 491
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 493
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 495
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 497
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 499
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 500
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 501
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 503
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 504
8 ROCKIES 505
8.1 Executive Summary 505
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 507
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 509
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 513
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 518
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 520
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 522
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 524
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 526
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 527
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 530
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 532
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 535
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 540
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 542
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 543
9 SOUTHEAST 544
9.1 Executive Summary 544
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 546
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 548
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 553
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 559
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 561
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 564
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 569
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 571
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 587
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 603
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 605
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 612
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 619
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 621
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 625
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 630
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 632
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 637
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 642
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 644
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 647
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 650
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 652
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 660
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 668
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 670
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 675
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 680
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 682
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 687
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 693
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 695
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 700
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 705
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 707
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 709
10 SOUTHWEST 712
10.1 Executive Summary 712
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 714
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 716
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 719
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 724
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 726
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 728
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 730
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 732
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 736
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 740
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 742
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 760
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 779
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 779
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 780

Select a Licence type

Custom Research

We are known to provide exact requirements. Try our CUSTOM RESEARCH option and get the exact search result you are searching for.

Contact Us

Postal Address:
808, Real Tech Park, 8th Floor, Sector - 30A, Vashi, Navi Mumbai - 400703 , INDIA .
Telephone: +91 22 27810772, 27810773
Email: info@marketreportsonindia.com
Fax Number: +91 22 27812707

Follow Us On: